Syria vs Uganda: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Syria
- Uganda
How they compare
Syria currently reports -1,885 kt against -1,910 kt in Uganda, a difference of 25 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Syria ahead.
Syria ranks 181st and Uganda ranks 183rd of 252 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Syria averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syria | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,525 kt | -2,397 kt | 871.21 kt | Syria |
| 2000s | -1,680 kt | -2,400 kt | 719.08 kt | Syria |
| 2010s | -1,524 kt | 7,485 kt | 9,010 kt | Uganda |
| 2020s | -1,758 kt | 4,142 kt | 5,901 kt | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Syria or Uganda?
- Syria, at -1,885 kt against -1,910 kt in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Syria and Uganda?
- 25 kt, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syria and Uganda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Syria and Uganda rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Syria ranks 181st and Uganda ranks 183rd of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf