Japan vs Madagascar: Forestland — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
Forestland — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Japan
- Madagascar
How they compare
Japan currently reports -57,140 kt against -111,347 kt in Madagascar, a difference of 54,207 kt.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 41st and Madagascar ranks 43rd of 49 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -84,302 kt | -182,393 kt | 98,092 kt | Japan |
| 2010s | -76,344 kt | -111,347 kt | 35,002 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Japan or Madagascar?
- Japan, at -57,140 kt against -111,347 kt in Madagascar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Japan and Madagascar?
- 54,207 kt, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Madagascar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Japan and Madagascar rank globally for forestland — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Japan ranks 41st and Madagascar ranks 43rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf