Austria vs Congo: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Austria
- Congo
How they compare
Austria currently reports -6,544 kt against -7,590 kt in Congo, a difference of 1,046 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Austria ranks 176th and Congo ranks 178th of 212 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -13,338 kt | 0 kt | 13,338 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | -9,136 kt | 0 kt | 9,136 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | -6,719 kt | -1.99 kt | 6,717 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | -6,536 kt | -5,693 kt | 843.09 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions (co2eq), Austria or Congo?
- Austria, at -6,544 kt against -7,590 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions (co2eq) between Austria and Congo?
- 1,046 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Congo rank globally for forestland — emissions (co2eq)?
- Austria ranks 176th and Congo ranks 178th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf