Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
-1,108 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-1,267 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
11th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
12th

Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
-2.0k-1.5k-1.0k-5000199020062023

How they compare

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports -1,108 kt against -1,267 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 159 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 11th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th of 21 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 2 and Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s -384.98 kt 9.25 kt 394.22 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s -390.3 kt -6.21 kt 384.09 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s -990.22 kt -1,258 kt 267.56 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2020s -1,316 kt -1,419 kt 103.04 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestland — emissions (co2eq), Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at -1,108 kt against -1,267 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in forestland — emissions (co2eq) between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
159 kt, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for forestland — emissions (co2eq)?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 11th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th of 21 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forestland-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forestland-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,006 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf