Japan vs Serbia: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Japan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports -25,263 kt against -31,848 kt in Japan, a difference of 6,585 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 236th and Serbia ranks 233rd of 252 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -160,628 kt | -24,765 kt | 135,863 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | -84,563 kt | -24,551 kt | 60,013 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | -41,365 kt | -24,821 kt | 16,544 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions (co2eq), Japan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at -25,263 kt against -31,848 kt in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions (co2eq) between Japan and Serbia?
- 6,585 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Serbia rank globally for forestland — emissions (co2eq)?
- Japan ranks 236th and Serbia ranks 233rd of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf