Jordan vs Malta: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Jordan
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports -0.3438 kt against -0.502 kt in Jordan, a difference of 0.1582 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.
Jordan ranks 98th and Malta ranks 96th of 252 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | -1.51 kt | 1.51 kt | Jordan |
| 2020s | -0.3765 kt | -1.2 kt | 0.8267 kt | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions (co2eq), Jordan or Malta?
- Malta, at -0.3438 kt against -0.502 kt in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions (co2eq) between Jordan and Malta?
- 0.1582 kt, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Malta?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Malta rank globally for forestland — emissions (co2eq)?
- Jordan ranks 98th and Malta ranks 96th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf