Laos vs Poland: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Laos
- Poland
How they compare
Laos currently reports -7,633 kt against -8,257 kt in Poland, a difference of 624 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 214th and Poland ranks 216th of 252 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -281.96 kt | -26,690 kt | 26,408 kt | Laos |
| 2000s | -66,862 kt | -76,388 kt | 9,526 kt | Laos |
| 2010s | -5,140 kt | -41,687 kt | 36,547 kt | Laos |
| 2020s | -3,798 kt | -13,642 kt | 9,844 kt | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions (co2eq), Laos or Poland?
- Laos, at -7,633 kt against -8,257 kt in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions (co2eq) between Laos and Poland?
- 624 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Poland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Poland rank globally for forestland — emissions (co2eq)?
- Laos ranks 214th and Poland ranks 216th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf