Luxembourg vs Mongolia: Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Luxembourg
- Mongolia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 37th and Mongolia ranks 37th of 218 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -524.2 kt | 0.2656 kt | 524.46 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | -284.53 kt | -66.44 kt | 218.1 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | -69.67 kt | -43.26 kt | 26.4 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions (co2eq), Luxembourg or Mongolia?
- Luxembourg, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions (co2eq) between Luxembourg and Mongolia?
- 0 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mongolia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Mongolia rank globally for forestland — emissions (co2eq)?
- Luxembourg ranks 37th and Mongolia ranks 37th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf