Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Namibia: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Namibia
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
22nd
Namibia rank
22nd

Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual over time

  • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Namibia
-2000200199120082025

How they compare

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Namibia ahead.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 22nd and Namibia ranks 22nd of 212 countries.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2020s 46.05 % change on previous year -17.72 % change on previous year 63.77 % change on previous year Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), annual, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba or Namibia?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), annual between Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Namibia?
0 % change on previous year, with Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Namibia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Namibia rank globally for forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), annual?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 22nd and Namibia ranks 22nd of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Namibia: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forestland-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forestland-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/namibia/">Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Namibia: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 7,731 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.