Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Caledonia: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
New Caledonia
100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
1st
New Caledonia rank
1st

Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • New Caledonia
-2000200400600800199120082025

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 100 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 100 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 32 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s -1.05 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 1.05 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s -2.43 % change on previous year 8.25 % change on previous year 10.68 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2010s 124.34 % change on previous year 16.67 % change on previous year 107.68 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), annual, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 100 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2016.
What is the difference in forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), annual between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Caledonia?
100 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Caledonia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2016.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Caledonia rank globally for forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), annual?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Caledonia: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forestland-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forestland-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-caledonia/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Caledonia: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 7,731 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.