Aruba vs Namibia: Global warming land, per square kilometre

Aruba
0 units per square kilometre
in 2024
Namibia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2024
Aruba rank
183rd
Namibia rank
181st

Global warming land, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Namibia
00000196119922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 183rd and Namibia ranks 181st of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global warming land, per square kilometre, Aruba or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2024.
What is the difference in global warming land, per square kilometre between Aruba and Namibia?
0 units per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Namibia rank globally for global warming land, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 183rd and Namibia ranks 181st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Namibia: Global warming land, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-land-per-square-kilometre/aruba/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-land-per-square-kilometre/aruba/namibia/">Aruba vs Namibia: Global warming land, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global warming land, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 11,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Global warming land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.