Jordan vs Norway: Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Jordan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Jordan rank
142nd
Norway rank
142nd
Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Jordan
- Norway
How they compare
Jordan currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.
Jordan ranks 142nd and Norway ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -27.73 % change on previous year | -23.37 % change on previous year | 4.36 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 2000s | -56.24 % change on previous year | 32.9 % change on previous year | 89.14 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, annual growth rate, Jordan or Norway?
- Jordan, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2022.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, annual growth rate between Jordan and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Jordan and Norway rank globally for grassland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Jordan ranks 142nd and Norway ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.