New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
New Zealand rank
142nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
142nd
Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- New Zealand
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
New Zealand ranks 142nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, annual growth rate, New Zealand or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- New Zealand, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, annual growth rate between New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for grassland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- New Zealand ranks 142nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.