Norway vs Vanuatu: Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Vanuatu
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Norway rank
142nd
Vanuatu rank
142nd
Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Norway
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Norway currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Norway ranks 142nd and Vanuatu ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -11.27 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 5.4 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, annual growth rate, Norway or Vanuatu?
- Norway, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Vanuatu as of 2020.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, annual growth rate between Norway and Vanuatu?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Vanuatu?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Norway and Vanuatu rank globally for grassland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Norway ranks 142nd and Vanuatu ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.