Aruba vs Libya: Grassland — Burned Area
Aruba
0 ha
in 2024
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Aruba rank
135th
Libya rank
135th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Aruba
- Libya
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 135th and Libya ranks 135th of 215 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 287.57 ha | 287.57 ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 175.92 ha | 175.92 ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 1,166 ha | 1,166 ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 21.45 ha | 21.45 ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Aruba or Libya?
- Aruba, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Aruba and Libya?
- 0 ha, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Libya rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Aruba ranks 135th and Libya ranks 135th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.