Bhutan vs Israel: Grassland — Burned Area
Bhutan
1,200 ha
in 2024
Israel
1,395 ha
in 2024
Bhutan rank
100th
Israel rank
99th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Bhutan
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 1,395 ha against 1,200 ha in Bhutan, a difference of 195 ha.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Bhutan ranks 100th and Israel ranks 99th of 220 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 545.16 ha | 583.72 ha | 38.56 ha | Israel |
| 2000s | 650.26 ha | 861.92 ha | 211.66 ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 1,044 ha | 1,349 ha | 305.55 ha | Israel |
| 2020s | 510.04 ha | 935.32 ha | 425.28 ha | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Bhutan or Israel?
- Israel, at 1,395 ha against 1,200 ha in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Bhutan and Israel?
- 195 ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Israel?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Israel rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Bhutan ranks 100th and Israel ranks 99th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.