Chile vs Ecuador: Grassland — Burned Area
Chile
12,775 ha
in 2024
Ecuador
12,886 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
73rd
Ecuador rank
72nd
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 12,886 ha against 12,775 ha in Chile, a difference of 111 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 73rd and Ecuador ranks 72nd of 220 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,150 ha | 2,257 ha | 7,893 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 12,773 ha | 3,393 ha | 9,380 ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 20,078 ha | 2,793 ha | 17,284 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 13,915 ha | 7,193 ha | 6,721 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Chile or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 12,886 ha against 12,775 ha in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Chile and Ecuador?
- 111 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Chile ranks 73rd and Ecuador ranks 72nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.