Chile vs Nepal: Grassland — Burned Area
Chile
12,775 ha
in 2024
Nepal
12,646 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
73rd
Nepal rank
74th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Nepal
How they compare
Chile currently reports 12,775 ha against 12,646 ha in Nepal, a difference of 129 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 74th of 220 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,150 ha | 3,908 ha | 6,242 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 12,773 ha | 5,731 ha | 7,042 ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 20,078 ha | 6,422 ha | 13,656 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 13,915 ha | 9,573 ha | 4,342 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Chile or Nepal?
- Chile, at 12,775 ha against 12,646 ha in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Chile and Nepal?
- 129 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Nepal rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Chile ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 74th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.