China vs Eswatini: Grassland — Burned Area
China
141,692 ha
in 2024
Eswatini
82,601 ha
in 2024
China rank
46th
Eswatini rank
49th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- China
- Eswatini
How they compare
China currently reports 141,692 ha against 82,601 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 59,091 ha.
That makes China's figure about 1.7 times Eswatini's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 46th and Eswatini ranks 49th of 220 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 141,462 ha | 23,717 ha | 117,744 ha | China |
| 2000s | 181,112 ha | 40,018 ha | 141,095 ha | China |
| 2010s | 170,435 ha | 41,647 ha | 128,787 ha | China |
| 2020s | 128,644 ha | 41,285 ha | 87,358 ha | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, China or Eswatini?
- China, at 141,692 ha against 82,601 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between China and Eswatini?
- 59,091 ha, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Eswatini rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- China ranks 46th and Eswatini ranks 49th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.