Cuba vs Malaysia: Grassland — Burned Area
Cuba
3,575 ha
in 2024
Malaysia
2,864 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
91st
Malaysia rank
92nd
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- Malaysia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 3,575 ha against 2,864 ha in Malaysia, a difference of 711 ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,593 ha | 2,130 ha | 3,463 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 5,938 ha | 2,609 ha | 3,329 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4,716 ha | 2,122 ha | 2,594 ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 7,485 ha | 769.4 ha | 6,715 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Cuba or Malaysia?
- Cuba, at 3,575 ha against 2,864 ha in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Cuba and Malaysia?
- 711 ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malaysia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Malaysia rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.