Egypt vs Rwanda: Grassland — Burned Area
Egypt
39,293 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
35,816 ha
in 2024
Egypt rank
58th
Rwanda rank
60th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Egypt
- Rwanda
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 39,293 ha against 35,816 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 3,477 ha.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Egypt ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 220 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,585 ha | 13,260 ha | 9,675 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 9.1 ha | 15,727 ha | 15,718 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 2,242 ha | 30,824 ha | 28,582 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 30,107 ha | 30,482 ha | 375.13 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Egypt or Rwanda?
- Egypt, at 39,293 ha against 35,816 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Egypt and Rwanda?
- 3,477 ha, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Rwanda rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Egypt ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.