Eritrea vs Suriname: Grassland — Burned Area
Eritrea
9,582 ha
in 2024
Suriname
9,190 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
78th
Suriname rank
79th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Eritrea
- Suriname
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 9,582 ha against 9,190 ha in Suriname, a difference of 392 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 78th and Suriname ranks 79th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,963 ha | 4,340 ha | 22,624 ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 16,930 ha | 10,359 ha | 6,572 ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 4,265 ha | 11,993 ha | 7,728 ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 25,127 ha | 9,587 ha | 15,540 ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Eritrea or Suriname?
- Eritrea, at 9,582 ha against 9,190 ha in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Eritrea and Suriname?
- 392 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Suriname rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Eritrea ranks 78th and Suriname ranks 79th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.