Eswatini vs Malawi: Grassland — Burned Area
Eswatini
82,601 ha
in 2024
Malawi
74,684 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
49th
Malawi rank
51st
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Malawi
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 82,601 ha against 74,684 ha in Malawi, a difference of 7,917 ha.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Eswatini ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 51st of 220 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23,717 ha | 48,234 ha | 24,517 ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 40,018 ha | 83,850 ha | 43,832 ha | Malawi |
| 2010s | 41,647 ha | 102,664 ha | 61,017 ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 41,285 ha | 80,505 ha | 39,220 ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Eswatini or Malawi?
- Eswatini, at 82,601 ha against 74,684 ha in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Eswatini and Malawi?
- 7,917 ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Malawi rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 51st of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.