Eswatini vs Peru: Grassland — Burned Area
Eswatini
82,601 ha
in 2024
Peru
107,306 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
49th
Peru rank
48th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 107,306 ha against 82,601 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 24,705 ha.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.
Eswatini ranks 49th and Peru ranks 48th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23,717 ha | 34,881 ha | 11,163 ha | Peru |
| 2000s | 40,018 ha | 31,589 ha | 8,429 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 41,647 ha | 47,188 ha | 5,541 ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 41,285 ha | 96,235 ha | 54,950 ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Eswatini or Peru?
- Peru, at 107,306 ha against 82,601 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Eswatini and Peru?
- 24,705 ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Peru rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 49th and Peru ranks 48th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.