Finland vs Libya: Grassland — Burned Area
Finland
0 ha
in 2024
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Finland rank
135th
Libya rank
135th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Finland
- Libya
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Finland ranks 135th and Libya ranks 135th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 253.66 ha | 287.57 ha | 33.91 ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 771.51 ha | 175.92 ha | 595.59 ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 388.64 ha | 1,166 ha | 777.6 ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 56.16 ha | 21.45 ha | 34.71 ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Finland or Libya?
- Finland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Finland and Libya?
- 0 ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Libya rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Finland ranks 135th and Libya ranks 135th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.