Grenada vs Pitcairn: Grassland — Burned Area
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Pitcairn
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
135th
Pitcairn rank
135th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Grenada
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 135th and Pitcairn ranks 135th of 215 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4424 ha | 0 ha | 0.4424 ha | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Grenada or Pitcairn?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Grenada and Pitcairn?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Pitcairn?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Pitcairn rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Grenada ranks 135th and Pitcairn ranks 135th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.