Guatemala vs Rwanda: Grassland — Burned Area
Guatemala
29,688 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
35,816 ha
in 2024
Guatemala rank
61st
Rwanda rank
60th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Guatemala
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 35,816 ha against 29,688 ha in Guatemala, a difference of 6,128 ha.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Guatemala ranks 61st and Rwanda ranks 60th of 220 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,398 ha | 13,260 ha | 862.29 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 13,485 ha | 15,727 ha | 2,242 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 22,531 ha | 30,824 ha | 8,293 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 25,063 ha | 30,482 ha | 5,419 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Guatemala or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 35,816 ha against 29,688 ha in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 6,128 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Guatemala ranks 61st and Rwanda ranks 60th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.