Hungary vs Iceland: Grassland — Burned Area
Hungary
86.1 ha
in 2024
Iceland
43.21 ha
in 2024
Hungary rank
126th
Iceland rank
128th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Hungary
- Iceland
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 86.1 ha against 43.21 ha in Iceland, a difference of 42.89 ha.
That makes Hungary's figure about 2.0 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 128th of 220 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 399.06 ha | 38.35 ha | 360.71 ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1,277 ha | 170.83 ha | 1,106 ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 441.31 ha | 0 ha | 441.31 ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 421.91 ha | 21.6 ha | 400.31 ha | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Hungary or Iceland?
- Hungary, at 86.1 ha against 43.21 ha in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Hungary and Iceland?
- 42.89 ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Iceland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Iceland rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Hungary ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 128th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.