Iceland vs Tunisia: Grassland — Burned Area
Iceland
43.21 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
21.47 ha
in 2024
Iceland rank
128th
Tunisia rank
131st
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Iceland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 43.21 ha against 21.47 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 21.74 ha.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.0 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.
Iceland ranks 128th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 220 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.35 ha | 827.9 ha | 789.55 ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 170.83 ha | 182.5 ha | 11.67 ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 2,368 ha | 2,368 ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 21.6 ha | 2,336 ha | 2,314 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Iceland or Tunisia?
- Iceland, at 43.21 ha against 21.47 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Iceland and Tunisia?
- 21.74 ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Iceland ranks 128th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.