Isle of Man vs Mauritius: Grassland — Burned Area
Isle of Man
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
135th
Mauritius rank
135th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Isle of Man
- Mauritius
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Isle of Man ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 135th of 220 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0457 ha | 3.99 ha | 3.94 ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.2211 ha | 10.7 ha | 10.48 ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 8.56 ha | 8.56 ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Isle of Man or Mauritius?
- Isle of Man, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Isle of Man and Mauritius?
- 0 ha, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Mauritius rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Isle of Man ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 135th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.