Libya vs Pitcairn: Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Pitcairn
0 ha
in 2024
Libya rank
147th
Pitcairn rank
147th
Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 147th and Pitcairn ranks 147th of 237 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 287.57 ha | 0 ha | 287.57 ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 175.92 ha | 0 ha | 175.92 ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 1,166 ha | 0 ha | 1,166 ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 21.45 ha | 0 ha | 21.45 ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area — fao tier 1, Libya or Pitcairn?
- Libya, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area — fao tier 1 between Libya and Pitcairn?
- 0 ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Pitcairn?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Pitcairn rank globally for grassland — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 147th and Pitcairn ranks 147th of 237 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.