Malta vs Polynesia: Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Malta
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Malta rank
147th
Polynesia rank
147th
Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Malta
- Polynesia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 147th and Polynesia ranks 147th of 237 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area — fao tier 1, Malta or Polynesia?
- Malta, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area — fao tier 1 between Malta and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Polynesia rank globally for grassland — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Malta ranks 147th and Polynesia ranks 147th of 237 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.