Mauritius vs Polynesia: Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
147th
Polynesia rank
147th
Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Mauritius
- Polynesia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 147th and Polynesia ranks 147th of 237 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.99 ha | 0 ha | 3.99 ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 10.7 ha | 0 ha | 10.7 ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 8.56 ha | 0 ha | 8.56 ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area — fao tier 1, Mauritius or Polynesia?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area — fao tier 1 between Mauritius and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Polynesia rank globally for grassland — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Mauritius ranks 147th and Polynesia ranks 147th of 237 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.