Norway vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Grassland — Burned Area
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 ha
in 2024
Norway rank
135th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
135th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Norway
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 135th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 135th of 220 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 130.86 ha | 0.4427 ha | 130.41 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 128.14 ha | 0 ha | 128.14 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 41.01 ha | 2.14 ha | 38.87 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Norway or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Norway, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Norway and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Norway ranks 135th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 135th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.