Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Grassland — Burned Area
Sri Lanka
42.75 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
21.47 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
130th
Tunisia rank
131st
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 42.75 ha against 21.47 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 21.28 ha.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 2.0 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 130th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,192 ha | 827.9 ha | 1,365 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 6,904 ha | 182.5 ha | 6,721 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 2,546 ha | 2,368 ha | 177.51 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 196.66 ha | 2,336 ha | 2,139 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Sri Lanka, at 42.75 ha against 21.47 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 21.28 ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Sri Lanka ranks 130th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.