Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burned Area
Uganda
553,757 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
806,890 ha
in 2024
Uganda rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Grassland — Burned Area over time
- Uganda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 806,890 ha against 553,757 ha in Uganda, a difference of 253,133 ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Uganda ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 220 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 446,429 ha | 1.02 million ha | 571,176 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 574,570 ha | 2.01 million ha | 1.44 million ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 603,257 ha | 2.17 million ha | 1.57 million ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 667,312 ha | 1.26 million ha | 596,192 ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 806,890 ha against 553,757 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 253,133 ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for grassland — burned area?
- Uganda ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.