Angola vs South Sudan: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Angola
0.3565 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.6995 ha per person
in 2024
Angola rank
4th
South Sudan rank
2nd
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Angola
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.6995 ha per person against 0.3565 ha per person in Angola, a difference of 0.343 ha per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.0 times Angola's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 187 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4392 ha per person | 0.8966 ha per person | 0.4574 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.33 ha per person | 0.7191 ha per person | 0.3892 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Angola or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.6995 ha per person against 0.3565 ha per person in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Angola and South Sudan?
- 0.343 ha per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Angola and South Sudan rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Angola ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.