Australia vs South Sudan: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Australia
0.7167 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.6995 ha per person
in 2024
Australia rank
1st
South Sudan rank
2nd
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Australia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.7167 ha per person against 0.6995 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0172 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 187 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8238 ha per person | 0.8966 ha per person | 0.0728 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.6096 ha per person | 0.7191 ha per person | 0.1095 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Australia or South Sudan?
- Australia, at 0.7167 ha per person against 0.6995 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Australia and South Sudan?
- 0.0172 ha per person, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Australia and South Sudan rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Australia ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.