Belize vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Belize
0.0456 ha per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0485 ha per person
in 2024
Belize rank
24th
Zimbabwe rank
23rd
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Belize
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0485 ha per person against 0.0456 ha per person in Belize, a difference of 0.0029 ha per person.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Belize ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0333 ha per person | 0.0954 ha per person | 0.0622 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.0298 ha per person | 0.1596 ha per person | 0.1298 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0351 ha per person | 0.1536 ha per person | 0.1185 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.036 ha per person | 0.0785 ha per person | 0.0425 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Belize or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0485 ha per person against 0.0456 ha per person in Belize as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Belize and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0029 ha per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Zimbabwe rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Belize ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.