Chile vs Ecuador: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
Ecuador
0.0007 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
78th
Ecuador rank
77th
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0007 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 78th and Ecuador ranks 77th of 187 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Chile or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 0.0007 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Chile and Ecuador?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 78th and Ecuador ranks 77th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.