Czechia vs Greenland: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Czechia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Greenland
0 ha per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
126th
Greenland rank
126th
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Greenland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Greenland, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Greenland ahead.
Czechia ranks 126th and Greenland ranks 126th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Greenland |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0038 ha per person | 0.0038 ha per person | Greenland |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Czechia or Greenland?
- Czechia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Czechia and Greenland?
- 0 ha per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Greenland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Greenland rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 126th and Greenland ranks 126th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.