Eswatini vs Gambia: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Eswatini
0.0665 ha per person
in 2024
Gambia
0.0521 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
20th
Gambia rank
22nd
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Gambia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0665 ha per person against 0.0521 ha per person in Gambia, a difference of 0.0144 ha per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 20th and Gambia ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0251 ha per person | 0.0581 ha per person | 0.033 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.037 ha per person | 0.0678 ha per person | 0.0308 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.0366 ha per person | 0.0575 ha per person | 0.0209 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.0337 ha per person | 0.0513 ha per person | 0.0176 ha per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Eswatini or Gambia?
- Eswatini, at 0.0665 ha per person against 0.0521 ha per person in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Eswatini and Gambia?
- 0.0144 ha per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 20th and Gambia ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.