Fiji vs Pakistan: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Fiji
0.0002 ha per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
Fiji rank
92nd
Pakistan rank
90th
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Fiji
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in Fiji, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.6 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 92nd and Pakistan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Fiji |
| 2000s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Fiji |
| 2010s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Fiji |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Fiji or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Fiji and Pakistan?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Pakistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Pakistan rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Fiji ranks 92nd and Pakistan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.