Japan vs Morocco: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Japan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Morocco
0 ha per person
in 2024
Japan rank
118th
Morocco rank
121st
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Japan
- Morocco
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Morocco, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.5 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Morocco ahead.
Japan ranks 118th and Morocco ranks 121st of 187 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Morocco |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Morocco |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Morocco |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Japan or Morocco?
- Japan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Morocco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Japan and Morocco?
- 0 ha per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Morocco?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Morocco rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Japan ranks 118th and Morocco ranks 121st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.