Latvia vs Liberia: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Latvia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Liberia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
107th
Liberia rank
106th
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Liberia ahead.
Latvia ranks 107th and Liberia ranks 106th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Liberia |
| 2000s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Liberia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Latvia or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Latvia and Liberia?
- 0 ha per person, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Liberia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Liberia rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 107th and Liberia ranks 106th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.