Libya vs Sweden: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Libya
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha per person
in 2024
Libya rank
126th
Sweden rank
126th
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Libya
- Sweden
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 126th and Sweden ranks 126th of 187 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Libya or Sweden?
- Libya, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Libya and Sweden?
- 0 ha per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Sweden rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Libya ranks 126th and Sweden ranks 126th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.