Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Grassland — Burned Area, per capita
Mauritius
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
126th
Sri Lanka rank
123rd
Grassland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 126th and Sri Lanka ranks 123rd of 187 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per capita, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per capita between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 0 ha per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for grassland — burned area, per capita?
- Mauritius ranks 126th and Sri Lanka ranks 123rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.