New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre

New Zealand
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
126th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
126th

Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.150.20.25199020062023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

New Zealand ranks 126th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 126th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0017 ha per square kilometre 0.0051 ha per square kilometre 0.0034 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0021 ha per square kilometre 0.0248 ha per square kilometre 0.0227 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0035 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0035 ha per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0055 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0055 ha per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burned area, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Turks and Caicos Islands?
New Zealand, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 ha per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for grassland — burned area, per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 126th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 126th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/turks-and-caicos-islands/">New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Grassland — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.