Sudan vs Uganda: Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Sudan
3.11 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
2.22 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan rank
20th
Uganda rank
22nd
Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre over time
- Sudan
- Uganda
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 3.11 ha per square kilometre against 2.22 ha per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.89 ha per square kilometre.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uganda ahead.
Sudan ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.7 ha per square kilometre | 2.85 ha per square kilometre | 0.1497 ha per square kilometre | Uganda |
| 2020s | 2.65 ha per square kilometre | 3.47 ha per square kilometre | 0.8167 ha per square kilometre | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burned area, per square kilometre, Sudan or Uganda?
- Sudan, at 3.11 ha per square kilometre against 2.22 ha per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in grassland — burned area, per square kilometre between Sudan and Uganda?
- 0.89 ha per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Uganda rank globally for grassland — burned area, per square kilometre?
- Sudan ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.