What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Isle of Man?

0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Isle of Man?

6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Isle of Man: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR

-100 % change on previous year

in 2024

Isle of Man

-100 % change on previous year

in 2001

China, Hong Kong SAR rank

142nd

Isle of Man rank

142nd

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

China, Hong Kong SAR
Isle of Man

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Isle of Man, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Isle of Man ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 142nd and Isle of Man ranks 142nd of 186 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Isle of Man?: China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Isle of Man as of 2024.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Isle of Man?: 0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Isle of Man?: 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Isle of Man rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?: China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 142nd and Isle of Man ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Isle of Man: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/isle-of-man/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/isle-of-man/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Isle of Man: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 218 places, 6,125 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.